My thoughts posted here just in case any part of my assumptions turn out to be true. I have ZERO direct knowledge of anything just in case my hypothesis turns out to be true
1. This was either deliberately planned and executed by someone individually (unlikely) or some group working together (more likely)
2. The actions/inactions or reactions to the deliberate loss of power were masterfully designed, planned and executed by the individual or group hereinafter referred to a “terrorist(s)”
3. The media is complicit if they are making every effort to sell this as anything BUT an act of terrorism
4. The fact that we have not been provided the names and background of the entire cast and crew to include anyone onboard the ship that could have cut the power and the exact time, knowing of the cast/crew would react and knowing the bridge would come down as a result of the deliberate power outage at the precise time - no need to be the one in command if you know exactly what actions/inactions would be take by the cast/crew to include the pilots etc etc.
5 if the power outage onboard occurred just a few minutes earlier or later —- I say again any sooner or later the bridge would still be standing - that fact alone should point towards an intentional act of terrorism masterfully planned and executed to look like an accident and having the media complicit in the narrative from the very beginning declaiming this was NOT an act of terrorism before even knowing WHO was onboard the ship and being interviewed as a potential insider threat / bad actor.
Follow up thoughts after posting.
Keep in mind this bridge is the ONLY route that HAZMAT can safely take. The tunnels for good reason can allow any HAZMAT truck loads. Keep an eye out for any attempt to create a “waiver” to allow trucks with hazmat -let’s just call a truck load of a fuel in the hands of a terrorist is a VBIED ——. Vehicle Borne Improvised Explosive Device triggered in the tunnel would cause way more damage to the economy by 2nd and 3rd order EFFECTS