Big on mind-reading, are you?
While my recollection may not be the sharpest, a quick bit of research finds that the jury found Trump liable for “sexual abuse.” The imbecile judge later stated “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape’... Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Sorry if I confused you by connecting two pieces of information to make a factual point. But hey, enjoy your semantic victory.
Then learn how to compose a factual statement, that is NOT misleading!
Posting what you did in your first post led to my comment.
Posting what you just did, was the correct one, which you did NOT post.
Hopefully, you have now learned your lesson.