Dude ...
It was a chickenshit arrest and everybody knows it. Why are you trying to make excuses for it?
“It was a chickenshit arrest and everybody knows it. Why are you trying to make excuses for it?”
I’m not making excuses for anything. As for it being a CS arrest, I gave you the law that covers the action. I didn’t make it up, I didn’t vote for it as I don’t live in Texas, and I don’t pay the Texas LE to enforce it in taxes I don’t pay. But trying to indicate that it is not a crime and that the arrest has no law behind it and is nothing more than a CS arrest, as you are calling it, is not factual. There is a law, and a court action that can follow the law.
But if you read the article, you’ll find she is more interested in her public personna than the law itself. The law was a tool to arrest her for violating the law, and the court is the tool to prove she was or was not intentionally trying to break it which is an important part of the law.
If the SCOTUS decides she was not guilty of violating the law, then she can irrigate other actions against the state. Police officers are charged with enforcing laws and taking into custody anybody believed to have committed an offense. When doing so, they must adhere to the proper protocols and practices and must not act outside of their lawful authority. They were within their authority to arrest her by law. The court takes over now.
wy69