If Federal Judges are not qualified to rule on matters like this who should ??
A Federal Arbitrator and Judge have both ruled the same way.
BTW, Lindell didn’t actually show the packet captures, he’s refused to show the raw data. He’s only showed packet headers not actual data.
Read up on the guy who sold the packets to Lindell, he’s a known con man who was turned down by others before Lindell paid him for the data.
Someone more competent. Your real question should be "How do we get rid of incompetent/liar judges?
And I don't know. We have a system for getting lying/incompetent judges in place, but we don't really have a system for getting them out.
A Federal Arbitrator and Judge have both ruled the same way.
And so they are both wrong. I've seen situations where everyone in the room was wrong except for myself. A bunch of people agreeing with each other does not make them factually correct. They could all be wrong, and sometimes this is exactly what has happened.
BTW, Lindell didn’t actually show the packet captures, he’s refused to show the raw data. He’s only showed packet headers not actual data.
I don't recall that at all. I took a look at his file, and it looked to me that it was only raw data, with no headers to explain anything about where it came from or where it was sent to.
I believe the guy who claims to have won his contest even said he had no idea what the "data" meant, and that's why he just tried to pull that time/date trick to claim he won the contest.
Read up on the guy who sold the packets to Lindell, he’s a known con man who was turned down by others before Lindell paid him for the data.
I got the impression that Lindell had been conned, and that he never should have made that challenge, but I saw the guy trying to claim the prize as running his own con and being totally unconcerned about hurting Lindell who had already been conned.
I had no sympathy for the guy trying to exploit Lindell's naivety to get 5 million dollars, so if he's gonna be a hard @$$ about taking Lindell's money, I feel everyone should be a hard @$$ about demanding absolute proof of his claim. (That that data is not captured packet data from the 2020 election.)
I believe the man cannot prove Lindell's data is *NOT* election data, therefore the nasty opportunist should get nothing.