Good to see someone on here that’s thought about the knotty legal issues. Interested if someone comes up with some solid case authority on the issue.
In Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., 137 P.3d 914 (Cal. 2006), the California Supreme Court applied California wiretap law to a company
located in Georgia that routinely recorded business phone calls with its clients in California. California law requires all party consent to record
any telephone calls, while Georgia law requires only one-party consent. Applying California choice-of-law rules, the Court reasoned that the
failure to apply California law would “impair California’s interest in protecting the degree of privacy afforded to California residents by
California law more severely than the application of California law would impair any interests of the State of Georgia.”
This adds to the complex mess. While I don’t trust Wiki....
“On January 2, 2021, Trump held a one-hour phone call with Raffensperger.[5][40] Trump was joined by chief of staff Mark Meadows, trade adviser Peter Navarro, Justice Department official John Lott, law professor John C. Eastman, and attorneys Rudy Giuliani, Cleta Mitchell, Alex Kaufman, and Kurt Hilbert. Raffensperger was joined by his general counsel Ryan Germany.[41][42] Jordan Fuchs, a Republican operative and chief of staff to Brad Raffensperger, while listening on mute, recorded the phone conversation, while visiting her grandparents in Florida.[43][44][45][46].