[JudyinCanada]

Wouldn’t he have to be formally charged and found guilty of insurrection? That could take awhile.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Wouldn’t he have to be formally charged and found guilty of insurrection?

Well, how many times are they going to do this? They’ve already impeached Trump a second time for this and he was cleared of this charge by the Senate.

This looks like double jeopardy and even triple jeopardy of you include the Jack Smithg indictments.

They’re desperate to use any crooked means to bar Trump because they have nothing substantial to offer the American People on the issues.

[milagro]

Since when do the Democrats need to have proof of a “crime” being committed before accusing someone of committing a crime?

[Nervous Tick]

>> Wouldn’t he have to be formally charged and found guilty of insurrection?

Only if the rule of law had any impact.

Anyway, he already HAS essentially been “formally charged” — that would be “Impeachment Two! The Sequel”. Result: acquittal.

But again, the ‘Rats don’t seem to be all that into following the law anymore.

[stylin19a]

that’s what i am thinking. there is already a law on the books re: insurrection.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383

[hillarys cankles]

Is it wrong that I hope the democrats actually succeed in keeping trump from running?

We’re headed toward a civil war eventually. Id like it to happen before I’m too old to fight.

[gas_dr]

any lesilation passed takes effect “signed into law” takes effect on presidential signature. This, if applied retrospectively is a bill of attainder and is specifically prohibited constitutionally.

[Shady]

They (the Demoncrats & RINOS) will simply add a provision stating that President Trump is Orange Man Bad and Guilty because we said so.

[Shoe39]

He was formerly charged. In his second impeachment, Tump was charged with “incitement of insurrection” by the House of Representatives. The trial was held by the Senate and he was acquitted.

Trump was acquitted of insurrection by the only court with the authority to try a President.

[hanamizu]

Wouldn’t he have to be formally charged and found guilty of insurrection? That could take awhile.

---

No Confederate officer or official was charged or convicted of insurrection, yet the 14th did bar them from office. This is why the dems have been trying to use the 14th Amendment to bar Trump from the ballot/office. At first they were hoping courts and judges could ban him, now they’re hoping a simple vote of Congress can do it.

[Boogieman]

Yes, and they would need for the Supreme Court case about Trump’s presidential immunity to get decided, and decided against Trump, before that could happen. Otherwise the SC would just put a hold on that case too.