Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer
This gives the Supreme Court major power to second guess any congressional decision over enforcement of Section 3.

An "election law expert" should know better than this. In fact, the decision explicitly says that only congress has the power to enforce Section 3, when it comes to the election of federal office seekers.

4 posted on 03/04/2024 3:30:46 PM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jimtorr

He’s a stenographer for the regime.


5 posted on 03/04/2024 3:32:10 PM PST by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: jimtorr

What it says is that Congress can enforce the provision by passing legislation prohibiting insurrection appropriately defined with the sanction being removal from office on conviction. Per the constitution the judiciary has the power to try all cases and the Supreme Court has appellate authority.


50 posted on 03/04/2024 8:26:49 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson