Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sarah Barracuda
I also predict a resounding 9-0 victory for Trump on this. Each state is constitutionally required to participate in presidential elections (and provide electors accordingly for the electoral college).

No state should have the right to restrict the choices of the voters just because some dipwad state election official decides they don't like a particular candidate.

I also think the timing of this is meant to put this silly issue to bed before Super Tuesday as it is quite evident that Trump will run the table and pretty much sew up the nomination that evening.

36 posted on 03/03/2024 2:35:07 PM PST by SamAdams76 (6,575,474 Truth | 87,429,044 Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: SamAdams76

Yeah I think even the commies on the court know that ruling against Trump would mean that red states could ban Biden off the ballot so basically in November we would have no president since neither one would get to 270..Trump should NOT be removed and neither should Biden, let the voters decide! And I think the reason they are revealing the decision tomorrow is because with Super Tuesday, Colorado votes and Trump’s name is still on the ballot, if they were ruling against him they would have had to had time to issue new ballots without his name, its too late for that so its gonna be 9-0 maybe one or two vote against him but I still think its gonna be 9-0


65 posted on 03/03/2024 3:58:00 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76

Will he have enough by then? I would like to see the math. It does seem inevitable considering how he has won every State so far.


118 posted on 03/04/2024 4:07:03 AM PST by Degaston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson