Nobody is going to argue that it is all very strange and there is very little that has been formally released by the sheriff. Up until the news that this has been turned into a criminal investigation, there is nothing that I recall being released as to why they have not put the details out there. Does the fact it is a criminal investigation provide adequate explanation for the silence? Perhaps it does....
So the statement that she was there alone... that is somebody’s pure speculation and is not supported by anything. Ditto for the statement about the pond being on a ‘remote part of the property’. There is nothing that supports that. By the way, I’ve been following this case fairly closely and that is the first time I’ve heard that one. No information has been released as to which pond so anything about that is speculation.
“No reason has been given why she was even there... And no word who she met with at the home. Etc.” That’s very strange wording when referring to someone own home.... Why would that even be a question?
“I have my doubts of the car being filmed by someone going into the pond.” Again, more pure speculation... no one said anything about it ‘being filmed by someone’. What Kyle Bass said is that ‘there is video of it entering the pond’... he did not say anything about it ‘being filmed by someone’. There is a big difference... Rich people have lots of cameras and surveillance equipment and no doubt the Tesla itself has cameras. There may be other ways the video could have been taken as well.
It would be real helpful if folks just stuck to facts and when speculating, say it is speculation and what the evidence is for why speculating in a particular way....
Unless the car itself filmed itself while it was entering the pond, I have no clue as to how the incident would be filmed. Do you?