Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thegagline

“Trump’s actions were in the normal course and scope of his position/employment .

To which specific actions of Trump are referring prior to noon on January 20, 2021 that would not fall under immunity?

If it is the speech on January 6, 2021 be specific.


30 posted on 02/29/2024 12:34:56 PM PST by Chgogal (Welcome to Fuhrer Biden's Weaponized Fascist Banana Republic! It's the road to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Chgogal
First the court has to determine what the standard is before one can apply the facts to the standard. I am merely stating that the Court may adopt an iteration of the qualified sovereign immunity concept.

The key is qualified immunity versus full immunity which Trump's lawyers are allegedly championing.

40 posted on 02/29/2024 12:40:07 PM PST by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 202)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson