The idea of a jury of your peers is by and large useless in a modern context. I think that for that to work the community has to be bound together by shared ideas, shared relgion and history etc. That is less and less the case with each passing day.
I oppose homosexual marriage, but I don’t see deciding original case differently if the wife took up with a man or a woman - the husband would be resentful in any case. Did he endanger her at their workplace? Did the employer fail to take action?
I like how Yahoo spins this as Alito hates gay marriage and completely ignoring the actual argument Alito and the lawyer appealing the decision to the Supreme Court is making.
That jurors were unjustly removed because of religious bigotry.