His basis for claiming this was the time stamps on the files. He showed that as the file was created after the election, it could not therefore be proof of fraud during the election.
I don't see any reference in the arbitration award to timsetamps or file creation dates.
Did you look at the man's initial claim, or are you just looking at what other people said about it?
I read the man's initial claim.
You should always rely on primary documents whenever possible.