[CFW]

Interesting article on the history of the case.

Another article here from BearingArms.com

https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2024/02/20/ninth-circuit-denies-california-ags-request-for-en-banc-hearing-in-gun-law-challenge-n1223899

[Scrambler Bob]

whether California can ban a truthful ad about firearms used legally by adults and minors—just because the ad “reasonably appears to be attractive to minors.”
= = =

This is what has stopped a local gun club from teaching gun safety and usage to young folks.

The program has been successful for over 30 years, but has ceased (hopefully not forever).

[MortMan]

I read the article, but still don’t understand whether the 9th rules correctly. Was California’s law struck down?

[SauronOfMordor]

Under our First Amendment jurisprudence, states can ban truthful and lawful advertising only if it "materially" and "directly" advances a substantial government interest and is no more extensive than necessary.

I think the Supreme Court could, and should, strike down this standard. Truth should be absolutely immune from censorship. This is how we got people being cancelled from social media over questioning the COVID vaccine.

[Mark was here]

Steve Lehto just did a video discussing en banc.

Appeals Court Agrees to Rehear ‘Utterly Bonkers’ Case

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpOy5knEzL8&t=426s