What a "namby-pamby" response! "It depends upon what your definition of 'is' is," "There are exceptions to the rule," etc. - pure sophistry and avoidance.
My "key/lock" analogy stands. Anyone with an ounce of commonsense will agree.
At the end of the day both men and women who are promiscuous are wanting from a moral standpoint.
That is a purely moral judgement, and I took absolutely no stance in that regard. You are free to believe what you will in that respect; you will get no argument from me.
I was speaking merely about the fact that a man has to break his butt to get "action," while a woman doesn't. That fact has real-world implications!
And then there's the neurochemical aspect and the verified loss of a woman's ability to pair-bond. The consequences are probably more devastating to a woman's ability to find happiness in life than the other risks (which can, after all, be mitigated).
Regards,
I’ll stand by my remark on what is considered “successful” is highly dependent on the person (influenced by culture, upbringing, etc).
My "key/lock" analogy stands. Anyone with an ounce of commonsense will agree.
Eh. Whenever I see use of the word “commonsense” and phrase “common sense”, I think of gun control advocates who like to use such terms to foreclose discussion on gun control or posit that those who hold different viewpoints lack common sense. Using it in this discussion is unfortunate, so will leave the discussion as is.