The judge let her get away with blathering irrelevancies rather than answering questions. An unbiased judge would have stopped her. I think he will let her off the hook.
The judge is young and Fani was arrogant beyond belief and out of control. I think it is more likely that the judge was shocked by her performance and at a loss for what to do.
He shortly thereafter called for a recess (probably so he could collect himself).
The judge might, after an "in camera" (private and in chambers) conference to discuss Bradley's claim of attorney-client privilege, permit/require Bradley to spill the beans on Fani and Wade.
Or maybe, djpg, he was letting her dig the hole a bit deeper?
Not sure...
Her arrogance was on full displey, beginning with the bullish way she stormed the courtroom. She was on the named witness list, I believe. She should not have been listening to the testimony, per Court instructions. But, it certainly appeared that she was fully aware and that is what drove her to interrupt the court proceedings.
If the judge determines in his closed door interviews that there was no attorney/client privelege surrounding the Bradley testimony, it seems to me the judge is even more pushed to disqualify both Willis and Wade, and force this case out of the Fulton County DA’s office all together.
But, we will see...it’s dhimmicrap politics, after all.
Letting her idiot father blather on and on yesterday while he waxed poetic about how incredible his life has been and what a victim he is was just sickening.
Biased/unbiased ....black/white..... red/green....human/ troglodyte , I don't think it matters what you are, there is no way anyone or anything was going to stop her. The roots of her manner of behavior likely came from the "talk to the hand" tactic that was popularized back in the 80's and 90's.