Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mass55th

Even though the D.C. courts have ruled that there is no presidential immunity, judges and prosecutors both have absolute immunity for their judicial and prosecutorial decisions.


170 posted on 02/16/2024 1:05:18 PM PST by Aagcobb (Do not bow down to the Beast or accept its Mark, Revelation 13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Aagcobb

There still is presidential immunity. It just doesn’t cover everything one might do outside their official duties.


187 posted on 02/16/2024 1:17:20 PM PST by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

To: Aagcobb
"Even though the D.C. courts have ruled that there is no presidential immunity, judges and prosecutors both have absolute immunity for their judicial and prosecutorial decisions."

Rules for thee, but not for me. It's my belief that when a Judge, District Attorney, Attorney General, etc., let a repeat violent offender back out on the street, and that offender turns around and kills or maims another innocent person, the individual that allowed that person to walk the streets, should be held criminally responsible alongside the perp they cut loose. If that rule was applied, "cashless bail" would no longer exist.

195 posted on 02/16/2024 1:25:25 PM PST by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson