Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

From the article:

“If this were any other defendant than Donald Trump, the rush to trial—which cannot possibly give the Trump legal team adequate time to prepare its defense—would be deemed wildly unfair.”

“Who appointed Jack Smith ruler of what American voters must know before they head to the polls?” At a minimum, Smith’s actions clearly raise the “perception of an issue under” Section 9-85.500, which requires Smith to consult the Public Integrity Section. One wonders if he did so, and, if so, what the Public Integrity Section and top Justice Department officials said to allow him to proceed.”


2 posted on 02/15/2024 4:50:05 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fury
editorial quibble: the active urging of the Supreme Court to facilitate the incumbent...

It is not the urging of the Supreme Court [possive pronoun], e.g. the Supreme Court is the one urging. Jack Smith is urging the Supreme Court.

It matters because my initial reading was the incorrect one - what? The Supreme Court is urging this stuff?

4 posted on 02/15/2024 4:55:05 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson