[Dr. Franklin]

No my friend, that is the exact point. As I said I’m a bottom line guy, and no evidence has been presented, as you just said. I’ve been patient too, but years have gone by now. I still hope something comes out, but the losing streak is long, and Trump only seems interested in keeping his supporters in line, who have clearly shown they don’t care about the actual court cases. They may think their anger will overcome the rule of law, but history shows otherwise. ‘The reckoning’ as you said is usually for those who defy it.

Trump erred in expecting the courts to do justice. The excuses have come from our judges. Understand that our concept of "due process of law" comes from the Magna Carta: "[w]ee shall not . . . deny or delay Justice and right, neither the end, which is Justice, nor the meane, whereby we may attaine to the end, and that is the law.” That was a prohibition for the King's judge's, not the executive branch as it's used today. So when the court's defy their constitutional obligations to do justice, what is the remedy? If Trump were to suspend habeas corpus and send CJ Roberts to Gitmo, people would cheer.

[Golden Eagle]

when the court's defy their constitutional obligations to do justice, what is the remedy?

A court’s role is simply to review, and validate, or invalidate, evidence, which is then used to make judgement. As Trump has failed to produce any evidence in support of his claims, the failure on display is not that of the courts.

[kiryandil]

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542617

[kiryandil]

Our obtuse clown won’t read post #104, because he’s not interested in actual proof - only Talking Points from Marc Elias and Perkins Coie...