The strongest arguments in President Trump's favor were the implications that every state would be able to arbitrarily remove presidential candidates from their ballots. Even Justice Kagan noted that. Aside from needlessly conceding many decisive points, Jonathan Mitchell's argument was profoundly myopic. He was the wrong attorney for this case. Sadly, President Trump has a long history of putting unqualified and compromised people in critical positions. Hopefully he will do better in his second term.
“Sadly, President Trump has a long history of putting unqualified and compromised people in critical positions”
Yep. If he’s got an achilles heel.....that would be it.
And Trump’s attorney argued that in support of article 5.