Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

These virtue signaling suburban white women would rather starve and have abortions then vote for orange man bad. 🙄 Spit

>>>Damn Suffrage!!!

As a white RURAL woman, I’d gladly cede my franchise if it meant wiser men would exercise their’s more wisely.


7 posted on 02/03/2024 10:54:26 AM PST by edie1960 (7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: edie1960
As a white RURAL woman, I’d gladly cede my franchise if it meant wiser men would exercise their’s more wisely.

Hard to tell, that. Many men of working age also want government to take care of them, as far as I know.

23 posted on 02/03/2024 11:10:45 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (FBI out of Florida!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: edie1960

We’re all “suffraging” from women’s suffrage.


71 posted on 02/03/2024 11:43:28 AM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: edie1960

I second that as a rural woman.


144 posted on 02/03/2024 2:35:12 PM PST by AbolishCSEU (Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: edie1960

I think originally, the idea behind the man voting wasn’t intended to exclude or disenfranchise women (or children for that matter), it was thought of as one vote per household, which was presumed to be in agreement.

The man represented his family in casting the vote. I can see why women would want to have their own vote - but I don’t think it was generally the intention to exclude them in the first place. Absent the issue of abortion, I imagine most men and women would be politically aligned - since they likely share economic circumstance and would suffer or benefit the same way from policy platforms..

I imagine in those days it would have even seemed a bit silly and redundant for both husband and wife to vote.

At my church we still have this rule that women can’t join the clergy and some women resent that and are trying to change it. I just laugh because although I’m a male, the idea of being a minister does not appeal to me AT ALL.

So, a women wanting to join the clergy seems akin to my wife insisting on taking the trash cans down to the road. I thought taking the trash down and joining the clergy were unpleasant chores men do - but if my wife wants to - she is welcome to take the trash down AND become a minister.

There’s not much chance I’ll ever come to church and listen to her preach though, because I don’t go listen to the men preach either except weddings and funerals when I have to I choice.

I know, voting is a bit different - especially when there are issues that affect women differently - but I think it’s mostly another way for Marxists to create social divisions which they can exploit.


152 posted on 02/03/2024 3:41:33 PM PST by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson