Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OA5599
You’re not using “unstable” in a technical sense.

???

I'm using unstable as the FAA defines it in Federal Aviation Regulation Airworthiness Criteria Sec. 25.173 — Static longitudinal stability.

The 737 MAX, while more stable than the F-16, is not a stable aircraft as evidenced by the MCAS system Boeing installed.

61 posted on 02/02/2024 8:11:54 AM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: T.B. Yoits

So you’re saying when a 737 MAX is flying straight and level and not accelerating, if the pilot pushed or pulled on the yoke and then let go, the 737 MAX would not return to its original trimmed position?

Are you saying the MCAS is needed for this, and without the MCAS the 737 MAX would not return to its position as trimmed before the upset?


62 posted on 02/02/2024 9:44:16 AM PST by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson