Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leaning Right
A judge who worked at the same law firm as an attorney representing a party in a case before him should recuse himself from the case. Right. And it doesn’t matter if it was 30 days ago or 30 years ago. Judges are supposed to be independent, and impartial. They are supposed to have no connections to either party. Oh, well. We all know that fairness plays no part in Biden’s America.

It is very difficult to recuse a judge. The legal community is somewhat incestuous. For example, judges aren't conflicted out due to lawyers appearing before them who contributed to their election campaigns. I literally worked on a Judge's campaign responding to political, union, and business groups surveys which led to endorsements and donations and the Judge didn't recuse herself when I appeared before her.

The law firm in question, Paul, Weiss, Rifkin, Wharton & Garrison currently has over a thousand attorneys. In that Plaintiff's counsel may have worked with the Judge over 30 years ago probably isn't enough to conflict out the Judge.

47 posted on 01/31/2024 9:15:06 AM PST by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: thegagline

Yeah, it’s probably not. Look at all the DoJ lawyers who go on to become federal judges. That doesn’t mean they can’t hear cases involving DoJ, just not cases that their former employer was working on while they were there.


51 posted on 01/31/2024 9:38:25 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson