My guess is that he will lose in court on Thursday. What do you think?
Take me off your list and gfy.
Yup… Ruzzia is toast now that we’re going to send another $60 billion to Ukraine because the first $200 billion wasn’t enough!
Frankly I’m more concerned with how Biden is trying to throw Trump in court while supplying Ukraine.
What say you?
Its like Trump asking a Washington DC court to put him on the ballot a snowballs chance in Hell.
Solovyov publically thanks Boris Nadezhdin for collecting the personal information of people who oppose Putin and giving it to ‘the competent services to be studied’.
https://twitter.com/NatalkaKyiv/status/1757473336487989252
25 s video
The Supreme Court rejected two claims by ex-presidential candidate Boris Nadezhdin.
Both of these claims, as experts noted, were not initially intended to be satisfied and were written to be transferred to the Constitutional Court. At the same time, the main claim – the actual denial of registration – has not yet been filed; previously the deadline was February 16.
In one of the lawsuits, Nadezhdin challenged the Central Election Commission’s instructions on verifying signatures, namely paragraph 4.2.1, which does not imply the presence of expert explanations for what reasons a particular signature was recognized as invalid. The inspection protocol contains only violation codes without any justification for why the expert considers this signature invalid, Nadezhdin writes in his lawsuit.
At the court hearing, a representative of the Central Election Commission said that a statement with a list of invalid signatures was signed by a handwriting expert based on his conclusion. However, due to the absence of this conclusion in the refusal to Nadezhdin, the Central Election Commission considers the statement itself to be such.
Nadezhdin also asked the court to invalidate the form of the statement of verification of signature sheets, since it does not provide space for the reasoning opinions of experts, on the basis of which this or that signature was rejected.
In the second lawsuit, Nadezhdin challenged the form of the list of collectors, which requires indicating in which region the collector was collecting signatures. Nadezhdin considered such a requirement not based on the law. Both claims were not satisfied by the court.