You don’t specify your views in your post on RFK Jr., so I am not sure I understand your post. So I did due diligence and looked at your posting history to see where you stand.
If you disagree with me, why not say so clearly and we can have discourse on it?
It is clear you think RFK Jr. would be a fine choice as a VP. If I am wrong, say so, but I had to glean this from your other posts.
But if you wish to criticize me for a “lack of critical thinking” which it is clear from your stance you wish to do, I would throw that right back at you and instruct you to read the voluminous posts (right here on this thread for you) that have RFK Jr’s OWN words saying EXACTLY the things that people deem to be “Non-MAGA”.
It isn’t a shallow characterization like the one you make of “Running with the left of center mainstream media’s fears and slander hook line and sinker”, it is his OWN verbiage.
I suggest that it is you who lacks critical thinking, in either being all in on some Kennedy worship thing, or seeing RFK Jr’s ONE stance on COVID, that compels you to think he would be fine as Trump’s running mate, regardless of his stances on making people climate criminals or being completely down with DEI and Marxist victimology.
If you feel that COVID response is the end-all and be-all and everything else, military, foreign affairs, tyrannical government and such are simply insignificant compared to COVID, why don’t you say so? Just go ahead and say it?
But thinking you are practicing 3-D Chess because you think selecting a near Marxist simply because the Left hates him too isn’t what I would call “Critical Thinking”.
At least listen to the podcasts or long form interviews for anyone that is seriously interested in his “own verbiage” versus the selective editing of a media that is rightly vilified in every other respect except when it is easy and convenient not to do so.