Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Senate committee approves ban on ranked-choice voting [Georgia]
Capitol Beat ^ | 1/24/24 | Dave Williams

Posted on 01/24/2024 11:18:56 AM PST by CFW

ATLANTA – A Georgia Senate committee has approved legislation that would ban ranked-choice voting in Georgia.

A well-funded campaign is afoot across the nation to allow ranked-choice voting, which allows voters to rank candidates by preference, Senate Majority Whip Randy Robertson, R-Cataula, told members of the Senate Ethics Committee late Tuesday.

Ranked-choice voting is allowed statewide only in Maine and Alaska, while Georgia permits it only for members of the military and other Georgians living overseas.

But cities including San Francisco and New York City have been using ranked-choice voting, Robertson said. In New York, it took 15 days to decide the winner of the mayoral race in 2021 because of the complexity of the ballot, he said.

“If you want (a voter) to stand in line all day, hand them a ballot with all these choices and decisions,” he said.

Madeline Malisa of Maine, a visiting fellow with the Opportunity Solutions Project, a nonpartisan group that works on voting issues, said ranked-choice voting has been a “disaster” in Maine. Voter confusion over crowded ballots filled with candidates causes a large number of ballots to be rejected, delaying results in some cases for weeks or months, she said.

“Voters are required to vote for every candidate on the ballot or their vote is thrown out,” Malisa said. “Results like these do not inspire confidence.”

(Excerpt) Read more at capitol-beat.org ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: ban; georgia; rankedchoice
This is a first good step by Georgia representatives. Let's get it passed into law.
1 posted on 01/24/2024 11:18:56 AM PST by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

Ranked-choice voting another Leftest scam


2 posted on 01/24/2024 11:27:23 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Good. Ranked-choice voting for a zero sum choice is a really crappy system.


3 posted on 01/24/2024 11:28:29 AM PST by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

It’s contrary to one man one vote.


4 posted on 01/24/2024 11:30:19 AM PST by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

And really puts our “democracy” at risk.


5 posted on 01/24/2024 11:46:20 AM PST by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Thank God! We have enough problems now in GA.


6 posted on 01/24/2024 11:50:27 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
Ranked-choice voting is unconstitutional.

It denies the voter the opportunity to change their mind in a run-off election in a narrowed field.

A ranked-choice in a full slate election would have different ranked choices in an election with a lesser slate, because the voters know who was eliminated after the first round. RCV forces them to choose later rounds without knowing who was eliminated in prior rounds.

That makes RCV "guess" voting, not "ranked" voting.

-PJ

7 posted on 01/24/2024 11:51:45 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
“ Voters are required to vote for every candidate on the ballot or their vote is thrown out,”

This seems unconstitutional. Some are being forced to vote for candies the do not want in office at all.

8 posted on 01/24/2024 11:58:19 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
Voter confusion over crowded ballots filled with candidates causes a large number of ballots to be rejected, delaying results in some cases for weeks or months...

Which is why the Dems want it. It allows more time to determine the number of votes needed and then time to manufacture...oops, sorry..."find" them.

9 posted on 01/24/2024 12:12:50 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (The Truth is like a lion. You don't need to defend it. Let it loose and it will defend itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Veto?


10 posted on 01/24/2024 12:17:55 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Doubtful Kemp would veto. Raffensperger is the one who started the whole rank choice voting thing.


11 posted on 01/24/2024 12:19:45 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Raffensperger is the one who started the whole rank choice voting thing.“

Well since ratburger and Kemp are thick as thieves l won’t be surprised if there is a veto.


12 posted on 01/24/2024 1:03:49 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CFW
“Voters are required to vote for every candidate on the ballot or their vote is thrown out,”

I was in college in the 1960s and the political clubs instituted the ranked choice systems for campus elections. In order to overcome it, campaigns advised one to cast a “bullet” vote. That is to say, you were to vote for only one candidate per office.

I seems the democrats have caught on to that workaround.

13 posted on 01/24/2024 1:16:07 PM PST by HIDEK6 (God bless Donald Trump. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Kemp pretty much just threw Ratburger under the bus a couple months ago on the election fraud. He won’t veto. Nobody in the GOP wants this.


14 posted on 01/24/2024 1:56:07 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Ranked-choice helped Murkowski (one of the worst RINOs) keep her senate seat.


15 posted on 01/24/2024 4:17:09 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CFW
Ranked-choice-voting (RCV) is un-Constitutional, because RCV opposes a major purpose of a state's Electors among the Electoral College, that is to represent the election day will of the people of that state as expressed by their votes on that day.
16 posted on 01/24/2024 4:34:36 PM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

It also caused Palin’s defeat in the house race.


17 posted on 01/24/2024 7:57:51 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson