Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Yes they have indirectly but never directly on the nbC term in a presidential eligibility challenge. As Justice Thomas said, they are “evading” that issue. I believe Chief Justice Roberts has been the prime-mover behind “evading” addressing nbC in a presidential eligibility challenge since Obama came on the scene, since the already knew the answer would not be in favor of Obama’s status and were afraid to address it at the time out of fear of the “racism” charge, or someone had some dirt on Chief Justice Roberts that kept him from encouraging the court to take up an eligibility case back in 2008 and 2009. Now he is backed in the corner and in CYA mode as more and more ineligible candidates have come on the scene, like Harris.

For some relevant SCOTUS cases on kinds of citizenship see Section 4 at this link: https://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Also see this chart for the various kinds of citizenship mentioned in the U.S. Constitution: http://www.kerchner.com/images/protectourliberty/Citizenship-Terms-In-Constitution-Chart.jpg


33 posted on 01/24/2024 1:26:47 PM PST by CDR Kerchner ( retired military officer, natural law, Vattel, presidential, eligibility, natural born Citizen )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: CDR Kerchner

It could be Roberts ride on the Epstein Express helps him forget the Constitution and other meaningful docs when he has to make the really tough USA-American calls when opposed by commies and socialists!


42 posted on 01/24/2024 3:04:46 PM PST by ldish (This ILLEGAL Govt is incompetent - WHO REALLY PULLS THE STRINGS IN THIS MAFIA?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson