Skip to comments.
Today’s Republican Party desperately needs an Eisenhower
The Hill ^
| 01/22/2024
| JOHN KENNETH WHITE
Posted on 01/22/2024 11:26:33 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Why not a Bush 41 or Gerald Ford? (sarc)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Donald Trump IS the Eisenhower and also the Reagan of a new era.
2
posted on
01/22/2024 11:27:48 AM PST
by
No name given
(Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
To: ChicagoConservative27
3
posted on
01/22/2024 11:27:53 AM PST
by
Ge0ffrey
To: No name given
That statement is so wrong its actually laughable.
4
posted on
01/22/2024 11:29:44 AM PST
by
Vermont Lt
(Don’t vote for anyone over 70 years old. Get rid of the geriatric politicians.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Oh my, the leftist writers are scared.
5
posted on
01/22/2024 11:30:31 AM PST
by
DallasBiff
(Apology not accepted.la is not the sharpest knife in the drawer)
To: Ge0ffrey
Donald Trump IS the Eisenhower Eisenhower didn’t sit out WWII because of “bone spurs.”
6
posted on
01/22/2024 11:30:55 AM PST
by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
To: ChicagoConservative27
AH, the Hill....
If you ever want to know what the
Uniparty/Globalist/Establishment preferred messaging is, they will tell you.
To: ChicagoConservative27
To: ChicagoConservative27
I read “The Age of Eisenhower” by William Hitchcock awhile ago. I’m probably in the minority, but I was not impressed with his actions as president. WWII? Sure, I’ll give the man full credit. But as president, he (in my opinion) intervened around the globe where he should not have, and he failed to intervene in places where perhaps should have. I think he mismanaged the Cold War, and Civil Rights. I think he let the CIA get out of control and I think the Deep State was largely born while Eisenhower was president. Did he know? I’m not sure. But I got the impression that if he did know, he would have approved of it. I came away not liking Eisenhower all that much.
To: ChicagoConservative27
>>Today’s Republican Party desperately needs an Eisenhower.
Today’s Republican Party desperately needs a Patton.
10
posted on
01/22/2024 11:34:56 AM PST
by
vikingd00d
(chown -R us ~you/base)
To: ChicagoConservative27
What the Republican Party does not need is a John Kenneth White.
To: ChicagoConservative27
Let’s make a deal: We all agree to the social conventions, popular culture, immigration policies, and treatment of Red China of the Eisenhower Era (minus Jim Crow), and then we can have our Eisenhower.
12
posted on
01/22/2024 11:35:11 AM PST
by
Dr. Sivana
("If you can’t say something nice . . . say the Rosary." [Red Badger])
To: Ge0ffrey
13
posted on
01/22/2024 11:35:16 AM PST
by
z3n
(Kakistocracy)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Presidents McCain, Romney and Dole agree
But none of us do
14
posted on
01/22/2024 11:35:17 AM PST
by
LRoggy
(Peter's Son's Business )
To: ChicagoConservative27
We do not need an Eisenhower. If one has to use WWII analogies, we need a Patton, and we have one in Trump.
Better analogies: we need a Jehu, a Kamehameha, an Orban, or a Milei. Trump can be any or all of the above.
15
posted on
01/22/2024 11:35:22 AM PST
by
chajin
("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
To: thegagline
Eisenhower didn’t have derpstate guttersnipes trying to ruin him and all those around him for the crime of being for America First.
16
posted on
01/22/2024 11:35:56 AM PST
by
Sirius Lee
(Next week on The Bickersons... )
To: ChicagoConservative27
Think what the USA had to do to get an Eisenhower!
17
posted on
01/22/2024 11:36:32 AM PST
by
Buttons12
( )
To: ChicagoConservative27; BroJoeK; x; Bull Snipe
Today’s Republican Party desperately needs an Eisenhower What today's Republican party needs is a Lincoln willing to throw Democrats in prison where they belong.
The way Lincoln used to do it.
18
posted on
01/22/2024 11:37:30 AM PST
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: ClearCase_guy
“Did he know?”
About the military-industrial complex? I believe he did...
19
posted on
01/22/2024 11:38:21 AM PST
by
Buttons12
( )
To: Vermont Lt
And Eisenhower wasn't even a combat general, he was a logistics officer and planner for most of his career.
-PJ
20
posted on
01/22/2024 11:38:45 AM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson