Just to be clear, you are saying you would defend Obama, if he tweeted on the night before Michelle took office as President, in all caps, his belief that all Presidents should be granted permanent, blanket immunity, for all actions that they took while President. You would you agree with him/Michelle in that situation?
The constitution makes provisions.
They must be really explicit, if you'd be willing to defend Michelle Obama over it. Care to share? I can be convinced, and am only looking for the truth. Thanks.
—> Just to be clear, you are saying you would defend
No.
I will defend the constitutional provisions of the presidency.
If you don’t like our Constitution, pursuade the states to change it.
Simple as that.
Sounds like you should reread the Constitution.
It isn’t long.