Show me someone who doesn’t have a bias and I will show you someone who is dead, show me someone who says they have biases but but them aside and I will show you an extraordinary and rare individual
Sorry for beating a dead horse but how does saying what I said and that I look at many sources and sites including Russian and RT prove my “bias”?
Bias does not equal blind, I have a bias to support military and law enforcement, but am not blind to their shortcomings or sometimes criminal behavior like the FIB
LOL I would vote democrat if I could find one I dont despise, grounded bias I would say
I find Russian/Putin action. Immorally wrong and criminal, doesn’t mean I don’t see shortcomings in Ukrainian actions. As bongino says there are bad and worse choices, I consider russia worse
I simply stated "I don't find any of the prognostications of 'winning' or 'losing' credible, for any of the many sides participating in this geopolitical struggle. I didn't argue my waiting for the end to this event is 'correct.' It is merely waiting. Tick tock."
You claim everyone has bias, but something you wrote doesn't show yours. Can't have it both ways. What you deem credible is what you deem credible.
Time will tell. Interim prognostications tell very little. Are the Zelensky and Putin regimes thuggish. You bet. One worse than the other. Good. But both are 1) not NATO members, and 2) at war for the justifications they say. Who's winning? Not something that can be answered. Who will win? That is something that will -- future tense -- be answered. What's credible in the "in between?" A couple of hundred billion worth of "investment?" Some think so. I think our nation is in ever greater debt, and THAT is the not-dead horse I continue to "beat."