[Wuli]

“What else would you call NATO members except subservient sources of cannon fodder?”

ROFWL

If NATO members are so god awful subservient then how come all U.S. Presidents since Reagan have complained that Europe’s NATO members fall behind in the military contributions to NATO? There are other areas of NATO policies and operations that have annually and persistently seen the U.S. takng positions NOT unanimously followed by NATO members in Europe. The answer is obvious - the other NATO members are NOT slaves to the U.S.

[Sirius Lee]

how come all U.S. Presidents since Reagan have complained that Europe’s NATO members fall behind in the military contributions to NATO? There are other areas of NATO policies and operations that have annually and persistently seen the U.S. takng positions NOT unanimously followed by NATO members in Europe. The answer is obvious - the other NATO members are NOT slaves to the U.S.

You make a compelling argument. It is America that is a slave to NATO. We would do well to walk off the plantation and kick that deadbeat organization to the curb.

[wildcard_redneck]

"ROFWL If NATO members are so god awful subservient then how come all U.S. Presidents since Reagan have complained that Europe’s NATO members fall behind in the military contributions to NATO? There are other areas of NATO policies and operations that have annually and persistently seen the U.S. takng positions NOT unanimously followed by NATO members in Europe. The answer is obvious - the other NATO members are NOT slaves to the U.S."

Simple explanation, slaves don't like to pay their owners.