I frequently denounce the media on this forum. Their coverage of legal issues is simplified to the point of being false. Thai results in the public being utterly ignorant of legal matters, even the very basic distinction between criminal and civil cases, and therefore the fact one doesn’t enter pleas I civil cases such as this.
This case is wrongful and should never have been brought at all. The judge is a prejudiced joke. It’s a sham from beginning to end.
All that being true, almost all of the comments on this thread are ill-informed to the point of being foolish. That a judge allows a represented party to make the closing argument AT ALL is all but unheard of. Having allowed it, the parameters or restrictions the judge has imposed in this case are entirely appropriate
Thank you for your voice of reason. It seems to be an increasingly rare commodity found in these parts…