[CDR Kerchner]

"Woodpusher" is up to the typical far-left, OBOT, anti-Constitutional tactic of conflating in a tantamount way the term "natural born Citizen" and "Citizen" and/or "Citizen at/by Birth". They also do the same with the terms "Subject" and "Citizen". Language manipulation and gas-lighting is a frequent tactic of the far-left. It is what they do. Here is a Euler Diagram to show the logical fallacy of their conflation arguments of the various kinds of Citizens regarding "natural born Citizen", the kind of Citizen who is eligible to be the President and Commander in Chief:
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2016/02/14/euler-logic-diagram-shows-logical-relationship-of-constitutional-article-ii-natural-born-citizens-to-other-type-citizens-of-the-united-states/

[gnarledmaw]

I know, Ive seen this act before.
Ive seen him juggle the one.
Ive seen him successfully juggle two.
When he uses all three kittens to perform “The Big Deal” he always drops them.

Many one note posters are like that.

[elpadre]

“...Birth and allegiance go together....”

We have many dual citizens in the US including several running or wannabee running for the presidency. Some are dual citizens not by application but because they were sired by a male citizen of that foreign country. Kamala’s father was a Jamaican citizen and their Constitution, I am told, grants Jamaican citizenship to any child he fathers regardless of where the child is born. India, I believe has a similar law. So the question is; how can we as US citizens be assured our president has allegiance to the USA only???