Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Macho MAGA Man; All

Devil’s Advocate for a moment:

If the claim is based on fraud because Trump knew there was no fraud in the vote, then his defense would be to introduce the evidence of fraud in the vote upon which he made is representations. Other cases (there are many) have dismissed the claims of fraud based on a lack of standing for the accuser. Trump has standing to assert it as part of his defense.

If the case is thrown out because Smith had no authority, then the evidence of the fraudulent election will never see the light of day through its introduction as evidence in Trump’s trial. The merits will never be reached.

The public will continue to deny fraud in the election.

Is Meese providing cover for the deep state to give them an out so that the real truth of the fraud will never be seen?

Just wondering.


44 posted on 01/02/2024 10:39:19 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LachlanMinnesota
Is Meese providing cover for the deep state to give them an out so that the real truth of the fraud will never be seen?

Not likely. Trump is trying to delay convictions in kangaroo courts before November.

47 posted on 01/03/2024 5:37:24 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: LachlanMinnesota
"The public will continue to deny fraud in the election."

What "public"?


49 posted on 01/03/2024 5:55:17 AM PST by StAnDeliver (TrumpII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson