The winning issue on this matter is women’s sports scholarships at universities.
The curious phrasing in the article, trying to rebut Trump, was
“the bill had the aim of preventing women and girls from competing in . . . .”
That is curious phrasing. What does “had the aim” mean? Did it explicitly forbid transgender women or girls from competing on women or girls’ sports teams or not?
Only monsters castrate 8yos and call it science.
It’s that simple and no refutation exists.