Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
You are dodging the question. What did the South do to force a one size fits all on the nation?

The Dim majority SCOTUS decision on Dred Scott said that blacks could never be citizens. Even in states where the Christian abolitionist Republicans won the argument and slavery was outlawed -- the Dred Scott decision meant blacks could never vote and, therefore, have a say in their status. The deck would always be stacked against them, including a possible return to slavery in states that had abolished slavery. Even if they never went back to slavery the blacks would forever be resigned to being less than citizens and never have constitutional rights.

Or another way to say it, just like in our time the SCOTUS decisions in Roe v Wad and Casey v Planned Parenthood removed the ability of pro-life majorities to have their way in their states and made abortion a federal argument -- Dred Scott v Sandford in 1857 undermined the abolitionist movement at the state level and made abolition a federal argument.

83 posted on 12/28/2023 12:24:02 PM PST by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Tell It Right
You are claiming the United States supreme court did this. What I asked you was what did the South do to impose a one size fits all on the rest of the nation?
87 posted on 12/28/2023 12:51:36 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson