Replies

To: krogers58

“misreading of the 3rd clause of the 14th amendment”

Smith is not misreading it, he’s trying to have it apply to Trump without there being any probable cause.

2 posted on 12/27/2023 1:26:06 AM PST by equaviator (If 60 is the new 40 then 35 must be the new 15.)

To: equaviator

This isn’t about Smith, this is about the Colorado Supreme Court. Smith isn’t part of this case in any way.

4 posted on 12/27/2023 1:38:56 AM PST by krogers58

To: equaviator

Trump is no officer.

6 posted on 12/27/2023 2:04:08 AM PST by Lisbon1940 (I don’t see why they would)

To: equaviator

Smith is not misreading it, he’s trying to have it apply to Trump without there being any probable cause."

This is what a traitor to the United States does.

17 posted on 12/27/2023 4:46:24 AM PST by Carl Vehse

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794