Digging up Nixon again I see? 🙄
To: ChicagoConservative27
The Democrats were threatening to prosecute Nixon for tax evasion and burglary. Those are private acts. Trump is arguing that immunity applies to “official acts.”
2 posted on
12/25/2023 3:31:32 PM PST by
bort
To: ChicagoConservative27
That is what you got from that article? Wow.
3 posted on
12/25/2023 3:31:55 PM PST by
Vermont Lt
(Don’t vote for anyone over 70 years old. Get rid of the geriatric politicians.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Immunity only applies to LEGAL acts of the office holder.
4 posted on
12/25/2023 3:42:58 PM PST by
rottndog
(What comes after America?)
To: ChicagoConservative27
BTW...POTUS can be criminally charged for behavior conducted in office...just not while he is POTUS. That is what the impeachment process is for.
5 posted on
12/25/2023 3:46:35 PM PST by
rottndog
(What comes after America?)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Ha ha! Hey CNN, how much didja pay Nick Sandmann? Ha ha ha!
6 posted on
12/25/2023 4:04:12 PM PST by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: ChicagoConservative27
Acosta the loudmouthed Cuban anchor baby born in the District of Corruption and to cowardly to leave. The boy is 100% ignorant.
9 posted on
12/25/2023 5:05:12 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(They've begun dismantling Arlington Cemetery, next comes diggin up white solders and dumpin' 'em.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
If I recall, Ford didn’t pardon Nixon primarily to protect Nixon, but to prevent the nation from going down the never-ending cycle of disruption that we’re seeing today by those who will do anything to take down Trump.
To: ChicagoConservative27
Are diplomats prosecuted?
11 posted on
12/25/2023 5:53:35 PM PST by
TornadoAlley3
( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Nixon didn’t need a pardon.
He wasn’t convicted of anything
12 posted on
12/25/2023 6:13:21 PM PST by
South Dakota
(Patriotism is the new terrorism .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson