I think there’s going to be a lot of kerfuffle about Clinton and Prince Andrew, because this is old news. These two are already known pervs, and they’ve been exposed for being friends of the pedophile Epstein. They both have not much left to lose, so it’s safe for the media to appear to be reporting these “big names”, diverting our attention from others who may be of greater interest.
Personally, I don’t think we’re going to hear too many “boom” names. They’re giving time for anyone who wants to appeal to have their name redacted to do so, if they have a good reason. I don’t quite know what that means. There will be some shenanigans afoot, to be sure.
thanx...
all y’all knew i couldn’t stay away.
somebody did some work for us awhile back:
https://archive.org/details/epstein-flight-logs-unredacted_202304/page/8/mode/2up
“Marcinkova, Nadia” is redacted in the new release but not redacted in the above release.
https://www.yourtango.com/2020337333/nadia-marcinkova-jeffrey-epstein-victim-turned-accomplice
what is the point of the new release ?
Are these names only the people who went to Epstein Island or are they people who flew anywhere on one of Epstein‘s planes? IIRC when this was big news a few years ago, I saw more pictures of Trump with Epstein, than anyone else. The picture was taken at Mar-a-Lago from which Trump banned Epstein after his predatory behavior was exposed.
Trump’s one or two trips on Epstein plane were also between Florida and New York City, not to Epstein Island. Of course the propaganda media made it seem like Trump was a regular going to Epstein’s evil places.