Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lepton

“It wasn’t repealed by the law...it can’t be.”

Read it again. It can be and was; partially in 1872 and fully in 1898.


93 posted on 12/20/2023 2:05:26 PM PST by CodeToad (Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad

The clause is still in place. A law cannot repeal a portion of the Constitution - which an Amendment is - it can only provide definition.

In this case, the cited law limited the definition of those to whom the Amendment applied. That is important, but it is not a ‘repealing of the Amendment’. That clause is still there, and it could be re-engaged, but only through new law, and likely not ex post facto.


115 posted on 12/21/2023 5:22:00 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson