Where are the charges that the Colorado electors for Trump engaged in insurrection against the US Constitution? Lefttards say Trump did, Trump did, however, in this case, this clause can only be used against presidential electors, not the actual candidate. This means that the electors must have engaged in insurrection, not the actual candidate.
“This means that the electors must have engaged in insurrection, not the actual candidate.”
That was my first thought and the reason I parsed the passage. Isn’t the “or elector of President and Vice-President” only one of a list of persons who might have engaged in insurrection?
That’s a nasty passage — the sort of thing that gives lawyers a bad name. Maybe I’ve misinterpreted it.