Skip to comments.
Trump, in filing, asks judge to dismiss 'invalid' Georgia election interference charges
ABC News ^
| 12/18/2023
| Olivia Rubin
Posted on 12/18/2023 12:21:55 PM PST by thegagline
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
The relatively short brief (slightly over 17 pages) filed by Trump’s attorneys inexplicably relies heavily upon Alito’s dissenting opinion in Alvarez v United States, 567 US 709 (2012). [the dissent is cited 5 times throughout the brief]
Dissenting opinions do not create binding precedent.
To: thegagline
The judicial system will not be satisfied until Trump is convicted on all charges in all cases. Massive fines and imprisonment.
2
posted on
12/18/2023 12:26:35 PM PST
by
CatOwner
(Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
To: thegagline
While you are correct…dissenting opinions do not create precedent…the make up of the Court since 2012 has changed significantly. Perhaps Alito’s views are far more likely to be in the majority now and Trump knows he is arguing to a higher court…as no matter the lower court’s ruling, this is aire to be appealed by the losing side.
To: thegagline
Do you have a link to the filing?
4
posted on
12/18/2023 12:28:43 PM PST
by
Fury
To: thegagline
Trying to “find” votes happens in every election. Very common language.
5
posted on
12/18/2023 12:30:07 PM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: Fury
6
posted on
12/18/2023 12:34:34 PM PST
by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
To: Fury
7
posted on
12/18/2023 12:43:26 PM PST
by
CFW
(I will not comply!)
To: 1Old Pro
Trying to “find” votes happens in every election. Al Gore looked at every hanging chad to find a vote.
8
posted on
12/18/2023 12:48:09 PM PST
by
Fido969
(45 is Superman! )
To: thegagline
I’d think they could come up with a stronger argument.
9
posted on
12/18/2023 12:48:50 PM PST
by
Fido969
(45 is Superman! )
To: Fido969
Lawfare must be stopped. We are on the way to becoming a banana republic.
To: thegagline
Why wait to file this motion? This should have done on the first day or did I miss something.
11
posted on
12/18/2023 1:07:03 PM PST
by
devane617
(Discipline Is Reliable, Motivation Is Fleeting..)
To: Fido969
Agreed. The law clerk who will initially read this brief, will rightly characterize it as weak as it readily relies upon a dissenting opinion.
It resembles a pro se inmate brief. Ugh.
12
posted on
12/18/2023 1:12:07 PM PST
by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
To: thegagline
The only thing the judge looks at are the consequences to themselves.
13
posted on
12/18/2023 1:27:44 PM PST
by
Revel
To: Revel
The only thing the judge looks at are the consequences to themselves. Some do and some don’t. The judge presiding over this matter was a member of the originalist Federalist Society which is a good thing. (I too am a member)
14
posted on
12/18/2023 1:45:31 PM PST
by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
To: Fido969
“Al Gore looked at every hanging chad to find a vote.”
He even had a BLIND guy looking and finding them.
15
posted on
12/18/2023 1:47:00 PM PST
by
faucetman
(Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
To: faucetman
Gore almost won
The Left wing FL state supreme court was going to let the
Demonrats harvest all the spoiled votes in Broward Dade and Palm Beach
16
posted on
12/18/2023 2:09:47 PM PST
by
ncalburt
( Gop DC Globalists are the evil ones)
To: thegagline
If it were only core political speech. The indictment lists much more than core political speech.
17
posted on
12/18/2023 2:11:18 PM PST
by
joesbucks
(It's called love-bombing. Claiming he's saving the world. This is a cult. Just back away. )
To: joesbucks
If it were only core political speech. The indictment lists much more than core political speech. Agreed. The brief ignores this fact. Neither the DA nor the Judge will be fooled by this willful omission.
18
posted on
12/18/2023 2:19:57 PM PST
by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
To: thegagline
Aliito’s dissent seems irrelevant to me. First Amendment, prima facia grounds for dismissal.
19
posted on
12/18/2023 2:23:53 PM PST
by
bigbob
To: bigbob
Aliito’s dissent seems irrelevant to me. Unfortunately, Trump’s attorneys didn’t see it that way.
20
posted on
12/18/2023 2:34:52 PM PST
by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson