Skip to comments.
Russia says it's working on major new agreement with Iran
Reuters ^
| 12/12/2023
| Reuters
Posted on 12/13/2023 10:39:11 AM PST by marcusmaximus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: All
The significant risk, given US providing weapons to a third party who launches them into Russia, is Russia providing weapons to a third party who launches them into the US.
Some portable Muslim group would be the obvious recipient, who travel to Central America and target the Houston oil refinery complex from there, and then disappear.
2
posted on
12/13/2023 10:46:44 AM PST
by
Owen
(.)
To: marcusmaximus
Tell me why Russia wouldn’t try to find allies when being attacked by NATO and the US MarxistMinimus.
3
posted on
12/13/2023 10:47:51 AM PST
by
wildcard_redneck
(He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
To: wildcard_redneck
Iran-Russia stronk as bull!
To: wildcard_redneck
Russia has been allied with Iran for several decades thus far.
5
posted on
12/13/2023 10:49:58 AM PST
by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: marcusmaximus
It’s a matter of perspective.
Are you upwind or downwind?
6
posted on
12/13/2023 10:55:15 AM PST
by
himno hero
(had'nff )
To: wildcard_redneck
except Russia ISN’T being attacked by NATO
more of your bogus lies
7
posted on
12/13/2023 11:00:00 AM PST
by
canuck_conservative
(NATO - keeping Europe free of Russian invaders for 74 years - you're welcome!)
To: canuck_conservative
"except Russia ISN’T being attacked by NATO" Don't be a lying propagandist. This is just like Iran backing Hamas attacking Israel.
According to the latest data from the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a German think tank, NATO members committed at least 75.2 billion euros ($80.5bn) in financial, humanitarian and military aid between January 24 and November 20, 2022. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/2/15/infographic-how-much-have-nato-members-spent-on-ukraine
Any country that contributes weapons to a combatant is fighting that combatant's enemy. NATO and America are at war with Russia and we're playing with nuclear fire.
8
posted on
12/13/2023 11:05:26 AM PST
by
wildcard_redneck
(He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
To: Owen
9
posted on
12/13/2023 11:06:05 AM PST
by
ansel12
((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
To: wildcard_redneck
You have a weird definition of war, it is a good thing the world doesn’t use it.
10
posted on
12/13/2023 11:08:40 AM PST
by
ansel12
((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
To: ansel12
So you’re perfectly fine with Russia and Iran arming Hamas, right? Because obviously the money weapons don’t kill Jews in Israel.
Zeepers are hair-splitting propaganda monkeys.
11
posted on
12/13/2023 11:17:20 AM PST
by
wildcard_redneck
(He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
To: wildcard_redneck
Any country that contributes weapons to a combatant is fighting that combatant's enemy
So since Russia contributes weapons to Hamas, by your logic, that means Russia is attacking Israel
Got it
12
posted on
12/13/2023 11:18:10 AM PST
by
canuck_conservative
(NATO - keeping Europe free of Russian invaders for 74 years - you're welcome!)
To: canuck_conservative
13
posted on
12/13/2023 11:19:50 AM PST
by
wildcard_redneck
(He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
To: marcusmaximus
Thank you, Obama, Biden, and the Warmongers at State. We said this would happen, along with a stronger BRICS and countries divesting from the dollar.
Idiots!!!!
To: wildcard_redneck
Could this up and coming new relationship announcement be military mutual defence treaties, i.e., if Israel or the US attack Iran, Russia would consider it an attack on sovereign Russian soil and respond with everything they have? Perhaps Russia is going to sell their oil through Iran and bypass any limited effect the Ukraine invasion sanctions are having upon that? (I know, oil is fungible and difficult to sanction when so many are willing to help Russia evade said sanctions....
To: wildcard_redneck
Weird post, you just sort of made up something.
16
posted on
12/13/2023 11:40:30 AM PST
by
ansel12
((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
To: ansel12
No, I made a comparison of two situations.
17
posted on
12/13/2023 11:47:37 AM PST
by
wildcard_redneck
(He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
To: wildcard_redneck
You think that Russia is at war with about 55 nations globally because they lend various forms of aid to the nation that Russia is invading.
I think Russia and those 55 nations or so would disagree with your take.
18
posted on
12/13/2023 11:54:54 AM PST
by
ansel12
((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
To: ansel12
"You think that Russia is at war with about 55 nations globally because they lend various forms of aid to the nation that Russia is invading. You're being obtuse writing about "various forms of aid" when a large portion of that "aide" is war munitions for killing people. When you do that you are at war.
Why are Zeepers such a lying morons?
19
posted on
12/13/2023 12:01:39 PM PST
by
wildcard_redneck
(He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
To: wildcard_redneck
Ya gotta admit. He catched on perrty quick on that one LOL!
20
posted on
12/13/2023 12:06:19 PM PST
by
MotorCityBuck
(Keep the change, you are filthy animal! )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson