Posted on 12/06/2023 4:19:36 PM PST by Angelino97
Soros? Signature move, for him.
“suggests that a trader may have been aware of the coming attack”
If they can only point to one trader being involved, it doesn’t seem like a good case, since you might concievably find one trader taking any unusual position you could think of at any time. However, if they found 100 traders doing some coordinated short-selling, then I think the case that they had some insider knowledge would get a lot stronger.
Probably the same people who took out massive short positions just prior to 9/11.
Kind of like 9/11?
thousands of terrorists knew about it in advance. Certainly thousands more that supported and help facilitate the attack knew. Dozens of embedded journalists knew in advance. Egypt knew in advance.
The only ones that were clueless about the impending attack coming our from the 25 mile fenced in area was the Mister Magoo government of Israel and their Mossad.
Can anyone explain short selling?
I’ve never fully understood how it works.
Yeah this has the stench of Soros all over it
You mean like cattle futures? Hillary is that you?
SS1
(Study: Someone bet against the Israeli stock market in the days before Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack)
Check Bill Gates, George Soros and Manchurian Candidate Barack Hussein Obama.
Maybe a time traveler. Have to be a little circumspect about winning every sports bet and being right all the time.
György Schwartz.
Gotta be Pelosi’s trader.
I agree. A one-off is an outlier; a multitude suggests coordination, perhaps even a conspiracy.
In a nutshell, within a time frame, you put an auto-bid on stocks that you believe are due for a correction. If you are right, you will make money between their low point and recovery point.
However, the risk is that the stock doesn’t correct, at least within the time frame you set your bid at, and you could take a wash because you are forced to buy a stock at a higher point than you wanted to pay.
The act of trading stocks or commodities in a way to make money if the stock or commodity goes down in value...
zactly
Basically, you borrow a stock (like from a broker), and you sell it. You agree, at a fixed point in a future to buy it back and return it to the person you borrowed it from. You are betting that the stock will be lower than the price that you sell it for today, and you get to keep the profit. You borrow 100 shares of XYZ company and sell them today for $50. You now have $5000. if the stock falls to $20, you buy the stock back for $2000 and pocket the $3000 profit. BUT, if the stock rises, you can lose money. Because there is no limit on how high a stock can go up, there is really no limit on how much you can lose. It is a risky proposition and I wouldn’t recommend it. In extreme situations, where there are limited stocks available to be purchased, the price can skyrocket as the investors with short positions try to cover their shorts. This is known as a short squeeze. Not for the faint of heart.
Prior to October 7, Israel was approaching a civil war, with prominent political actors urging violence and military mutiny, with secular tech moguls looking to move money out of Israel. If that’s not a reason to short sell, nothing is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.