Whistleblower: 20% of New Zealand’s Vaxxed Population Have Died

STEVE KIRSCH COMMENTS:

So Barry released the anonymized data which would expose the truth about what the New Zealand public health records contain without violating anyone’s privacy. 4M of the 12M records.

HNZ then decided to try to stop the truth from getting out. So they contacted Wasabi and MEGA and had them nuke my account and Kevin McKernan’s account even though neither of us had done anything wrong. Kevin lost years of work that cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars to create. This is work relied on by other researchers all over the world.

HNZ failed to stop the distribution of the truth. EPIC FAIL.

So now what?

The genie is now (finally) out of the bottle, thanks to HNZ employee Barry Young
Barry will likely spend 7 years in prison for the crime of exposing a crime.

HNZ: I have an important message for you.

The only way you can mitigate damages now is to show us your analysis of your own data showing the COVID vaccines are completely safe.

Why are you hiding this? Surely, you have the analysis. Show us all the analyses you did since the start of the vaccine rollout. You have to show us all documents with dates, showing us every safety analysis you did on your own data. If you don’t we’ll get it via FOIA request.

It would be a more efficient use of your time to simply publish all these analyses now, rather than have hundreds of New Zealanders request it.

The only thing you can be sure of is that not a single mainstream media organization in the world will ask you for these analyses. Like you, they want to keep it hidden. So the NZ press, the New York Times, Wall St. Journal, CNN, 60 Minutes… you’re safe from them. They are never going to ask questions. The vaccine will never be unsafe in their eyes. They are all paid to look the other way by their advertisers.

But the public will ask via FOIA and you’ll have to respond. Are you going to fabricate documents that never existed? That would be criminal.

Or are you going to admit you never did a proper analysis of the data just like the California Department of Public Health never bothered to do any analysis either. Admit the truth.

Bottom line: Show us your analysis now, or the people of New Zealand will require it be produced under FOIA.

Why can’t we talk about it? Let’s have a civil scientific dialog, shall we?
How about we have a publicly recorded video call with your epidemiologists vs. my epidemiologists so we can expose who is telling the truth and who is killing people? Since you can’t stop the distribution of the public health data, this is your only option if you want to reduce “vaccine hesitancy.”

Thank you for your attention.

And one more thing…
The first rule of holes: when you find yourself in one, stop digging.

Maybe you want to consider withdrawing your criminal charges against Barry Young? He did not commit a crime. He relied on the advice of experts including UK Professor Norman Fenton before releasing the data. Of course, you wouldn’t know that because you never asked him. You never even talked to him before having him arrested. Your actions are despicable.

Have a nice day. And thank you for allowing the data to be set free and drawing world attention to the importance of data transparency. And encouraging other health authorities to do the same!

New Zealand Government Data Suggests Alarming Pfizer Death Rate
BY J.R. Bruning J.R. BRUNING DECEMBER 1, 2023

BROWNSTONE » BROWNSTONE INSTITUTE ARTICLES » NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT DATA SUGGESTS ALARMING PFIZER DEATH RATE

A statistician has come forward with disturbing information that, if correct, will promote doubt on the safety of mRNA vaccination for decades into the future. The whistleblower was involved with building and implementing the New Zealand government database vaccine payment system, a ‘pay per dose system’ that would remit payments to vaccination providers.

In an interview with New Zealand journalist and lawyer Liz Gunn, and using a false name of Winston Smith, the statistician states that

“Science is all about being sceptical and curious at the same time. We shouldn’t be criticised for being sceptical, we shouldn’t be vilified for having a different opinion. We should be allowed to have that.

Smith explained by way of introduction ‘I’m not anti-vax. I helped build the vaccination system. But I am pro-choice and I do believe in [the] fundamental freedoms of humans, and that we should not have a procedure forced onto us because of a mandate just to keep our jobs. That is against everything I stand for. It is a huge overreach by the government.’

Smith’s work also involved data analysis. Smith had noticed discrepancies almost immediately the system went live with people dying within a week of being injected.

Looking at the government data, he ran a query to identify days when more than one hundred and twenty people died in New Zealand. Historic peaks above this level, as Smith demonstrates, are rare. This normal distribution of deaths at this level is only rarely exceeded on the occasional day, or for disaster events, such as the 2011 Christchurch earthquake, mosque shooting in 2017, or an unusually bad influenza season.

In the small country of New Zealand, daily mortality levels that exceed one hundred and twenty could plausibly be considered to be a signal of a disaster event that should trigger public discussion and controversy.

New Zealand had a highly unusual winter flu season in June-July 2019, and no days exceeded the harm-signal level in 2020.

Excerpted:
https://brownstone.org/articles/new-zealand-government-data-suggests-alarming-pfizer-death-rate/

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.