As much as I would like to catch her and the judge with something that discredits them, this event is not it. It is not a bombshell, it is not even a smoking gun. Trump is not even mentioned. What she said EVERY democrat in the nation says.
This kind of unsubstantial false sensationalism makes us look foolish. Let the democrats twist stuff into something it is not. We should not lower ourselves to their standards and do the same.
This is a trial without a jury, thus dependent upon the unbiased assessment of the judge. He is clearly biased, and that this woman is his primary law clerk is objective evidence of this. Outing this serves a purpose.
“What she said EVERY democrat in the nation says.”
Yes, but in a court of law, there cannot be a thread of venomous bias against the defendant by the judge and it takes a foolish person to think this makes “us” look foolish.
You state, “This kind of unsubstantial false sensationalism makes us look foolish. Let the democrats twist stuff into something it is not. We should not lower ourselves to their standards and do the same.”
You obviously don’t understand that we are at war. What appears to you to be unsubstantial happens to be crucial to many observers.
The idea that she camapigned with thr now AG whose sole raison d’etre is to get Trump certain lights a torch to the idea of blind justice. The fact that this isn’t a smoking gun or at all concerning to half the country dure is a smoking gun for the fall of a nation.
Agreed. This is a nothingburger
No. Of course not.
We should be good Republican losers...as usual.
It would be unseemly to actually fight back. Better to lose again than to "Lower ourselves".