“In fact, your argument is ludicrous. What you’re saying is we shouldn’t engage in the political aspects of a matter which is wholly political.”
Actually it is the opposite. Judges and court clerks are completely legal to belong to and be active in their chosen political party. Unfortunately they have the same constitutional rights a Republican judge or court clerk would have.
What is ludicrous is this article claiming that a democrat being a typical democrat is biased against Trump, of course she is, she is a Democrat. Why? Because she didn’t praise Trump over her chosen party instead? Because she is active in her chosen party when she has the legal right to be?
There is no meat there, it is completely normal and expected. Just as it would be if she was a Republican calling Trump the best President ever. If she had spoken ill against Trump and used his name then we would actually have some meat there as real evidence of bias. This is dramatization of nothing and just crying wolf when there is no wolf.
It is grasping at straws and just makes us look foolish for over dramatizing a nothing burger.
You’re using tactics of deception.
Nobody said she broke the law. Yet your argument is “she has the legal right.”
The Alinskyists teach “Hold the enemy to their own standards.” This means telling conservatives not to fight so they can be “the adults in the room.”
You’re fighting for the enemy of America.