“Yes, but in a court of law”
Key words here... “In a court of law”. It was not said in a court and it was not a court in session. Just as republican judges and court officers are allowed, unfortunately off the clock they still have certain individual rights and freedom of speech.
Again, if she had actually mentioned Trump’s name plus bias speech against him it would absolutely be substantial for sure. Until then it is just an effort to make a mountain out of a molehill. It is a historic low bar liberal practice to do this and we should not lower ourselves down to their standards.
For crying out loud, it is a known concept that judges have to recuse themselves based on conduct previous to the trial they are about to preside over. It does not have to happen in court. The “court of law” I was referring to means the standard is set much higher than just run of the mill opinion proclamations.
“we should not lower ourselves down to their standards”
The only substance in your argument is a call to be passive.
The chronic disease of conservatives is passivity. This illness of ours has allowed the communists to gain ground.
In the matter at hand, if enough of an outcry is raised there will be real consequences for the judge.
But if enough posters on websites make comments like yours, then there will be no consequences.