Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thegagline

You left off “take citizens’ land for wacky carbon sequester pipelines and stuff”.

And if you widen your research to include sources other than Burgum’s own puffery, you come across interesting items like this:

https://news.prairiepublic.org/local-news/2021-05-12/burgum-nd-carbon-neutral-by-2030

“Carbon neutral by 2030” is absolutely climatista territory. Fiscal conservative my ass.


10 posted on 11/21/2023 11:28:00 AM PST by Nervous Tick ("First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people...": ISLAM is the problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Nervous Tick

Burgum is obviously not convincing anyone...well ok maybe one...


11 posted on 11/21/2023 11:30:19 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Nervous Tick
You purposely left out the integral detail: ”In an interview after his speech, Burgum said it would not be done by regulation, but by innovation, and by driving capital investments to the energy and agriculture industries.
13 posted on 11/21/2023 11:33:55 AM PST by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson