Posted on 11/14/2023 10:35:09 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The issue of voter fraud and election integrity dominated much of Trump's presidency, and by its end in 2020, many of his supporters raised concerns about the credibility of the electoral system.
Well, voter fraud appears to have metastasized and is now out of control. We saw that in Arizona's gubernatorial race, and we see it all across America.
In recent years, concerns about voter fraud have grown significantly, with many individuals asserting that there are systemic issues within the American electoral system.
One striking example cited by those raising concerns about voter fraud is the Kentucky gubernatorial election, which looked like a close race, with the Democratic nominee, Andy Beshear, defeating Republican incumbent Matt Bevin by just over 5,000 votes, or 0.37%. This made it the closest gubernatorial election in Kentucky since 1899 by votes and the closest ever by percentage.
The discrepancy in the voting patterns in this election raises eyebrows and sparks suspicions among those alleging voter fraud. While Kentucky Republicans voted overwhelmingly for their party's candidates for other statewide offices, such as Attorney General and Secretary of State, they simultaneously chose a Democrat for the governor's position. This divergent behavior among voters, especially within the same party, appears perplexing and contradictory.
The core argument here is that when voters consistently support one political party across multiple offices, they are expected to do the same for the gubernatorial race. However, the outcome of the Kentucky gubernatorial election needed to align with this pattern, raising concerns about the integrity of the voting process. Such inconsistencies in voting behavior could indicate manipulation or irregularities in the election system, as it is unusual for voters to exhibit such discrepancies in their choices.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Allegations of systemic voter fraud in America, exemplified by cases such as the Kentucky elections, deserve serious consideration. While some may dismiss these concerns, it is essential to recognize that the electoral system's rectitude is paramount.
Investigating these claims and addressing potential issues will help safeguard the democratic process and ensure the public's trust in elections remains intact. By taking these concerns seriously, we can work to protect the sanctity of our democratic institutions.
The election fraud in 2024 will eclipse that of 2020 or 2022. Nothing will be done about it.
The democrats have an army of zombies that do it for free
Color me surprised
Heritage Foundation-—Types of Voter Fraud
Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
Requesting absentee ballots and voting without the knowledge of the actual voter; or obtaining the absentee ballot from a voter and either filling it in directly and forging the voter’s signature or illegally telling the voter who to vote for.
Ineligible Voting
Illegal registration and voting by individuals who are not U.S. citizens, are convicted felons, or are otherwise not eligible to vote.
Impersonation Fraud At The Polls
Voting in the name of other legitimate voters and voters who have died, moved away, or lost their right to vote because they are felons, but remain registered.
Buying Votes
Paying voters to cast either an in-person or absentee ballot for a particular candidate.
Ballot Petition Fraud
Forging the signatures of registered voters on the ballot petitions that must be filed with election officials in some states for a candidate or issue to be listed on the official ballot
Duplicate Voting
Registering in multiple locations and voting in the same election in more than one jurisdiction or state.
False Registrations
Voting under fraudulent voter registrations that either use a phony name and a real or fake address or claim residence in a particular jurisdiction where the registered voter does not actually live and is not entitled to vote.
Altering The Vote Count
Changing the actual vote count either in a precinct or at the central location where votes are counted.
Illegal “Assistance” At The Polls
Forcing or intimidating voters—particularly the elderly, disabled, illiterate, and those for whom English is a second language—to vote for particular candidates while supposedly providing them with “assistance.”
Who’s stopping the Lying Fraudulent DEMONocRATS from stealing these lower-level but important elections?
Satan is very active right now, the DEMONocRATS are his hands and feet, and George Soros and friends are his bankroll.
“The core argument here is that when voters consistently support one political party across multiple offices, they are expected to do the same for the gubernatorial race.”
Not quite
eg 2018 Maryland elections
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Maryland
Democratic 1,493,047
Republican 737,906
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Maryland_gubernatorial_election
Republican Larry Hogan (incumbent) 1,275,644 55.35%
Democratic Ben Jealous 1,002,639 43.51%
She is ridiculing those of us who believe that the gubernatorial election of '22 was rampant with fraud.
I stopped reading the piece at that point as it was not clear to me what his purpose was and why that article was being used to support his case.
The “beautiful” thing about 21st century American voter fraud is it only needs to be very limited to have a huge asymmetric effect.
All the suburban and rural deplorables can show up to vote, have their IDs checked, wait in line, etc....and they will feel everything is fine, because it pretty much is fine.
Fraud only needs one or two blue municipalities, and even within them, a few districts, with a mere handful of permanent government bureaucrats controlling the vote, to find or manufacture a few thousand votes which flip a state.
The fat female drones in downtown Milwaukee or Philadelphia are not the cause - they are simply following orders. But they will certainly not ask questions when ballots show up out of nowhere, or are told to re-run the same batch 5 times.
When I was young voter fraud was traditionally done in black precincts....
There were probably more legitimate votes being negated by the ELECTION fraud in 2020 than there were illegitimate voters having their “vote” count in the tabulation of fraudulent election results.
I have no doubt that Pennsylvanians in an off year election did not vote in a Supreme Court race that much for a democrat judge.
What else would you expect? In One Party Cities, Districts and States, the One Party, the Government Party, runs and manages the elections. That flows from the fact that One Party jurisdictions breed and foster corruption at every level of government. Thanks to open borders and mass migration of people into the US from countries where Government corruption is the accepted norm, there really is no fixing this.
Add to that the fact that Xi of China has obviously wakened to the extreme level of corruption at the Federal level where the One Party controls everything, its not long before the Chinese can simply buy off the US government and turn the US into a puppet state.
In the last election cycle Biden received millions of votes on “ballots” where the Democrats down the ballots received no votes. Humans don’t do that....
There is not systematic, large scale fraud in our electoral system. The system is instead intentionally designed to allow widespread small-scale fraud.
Minnesota allows for same-day registration. All you need is a utility bill, or a resident of the precinct who can vouch for you. There was a proposal to allow a single voter to vouch for only 25 others, in a single election.
Guess who voted it down?
OK, then, here is the question: Does KY use electronic vote “tabulators?” if so, there is your answer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.