Well duh I’m not a scientist and never pretended to be one. Anything I post here are concerns expressed by respected scientists that I’m bringing attention to for those interested. I never claimed the sv49 virus itself was in the vaxx it’s an sv40 promoter sequence as you’ve said. It can be considered possibly oncogenic because it assists any mRNA or DNA present in the vaxx to pass through cellular membranes more easily including the nucleus where it could potentially wreak havoc.
“Professional antivaxxers, on the other hand, usually do not provide references”
Seeing as to how Pfizer hid from regulators the fact that that sv40 promotor sequence was in the vaxx there won’t be any mention of it in the Pfizer documents for me to reference.
“Oh, BTW, you only posted one link and that went to an antivax fearmongering blog.”
Arkmedic is a PhD/MD who seems very well respected among other dissident scientists who often cite his blog because he does a good job explaining things to non scientists like myself. To dismiss his substack as an “antivax fearmongering blog” is rather ridiculous and shows your bias. You disagree with these dissident scientists apparently which is fine. You can make your case and they will make theirs and people can decide who they want to believe.
A DNA virus (like the measles virus, herpes viruses, or papillomaviruses) can insert its DNA into the human genome. An RNA retrovirus has an enzyme that can make DNA using the RNA as a template and other enzymes to integrate that viral DNA into the genome. Depending on where it lands, the inserted DNA can disrupt genes involved in cell cycle control, which can lead to cancer. Some viruses contain oncogenes which mimic human genes and disrupt their functions, which can also lead to cancer.
A plasmid has none of these properties. These plasmids only function in bacteria and, even in bacteria, do not integrate into the genome.
Should I mention that bacteria that live in your body also have plasmids? Or that literally everything you eat is full of DNA and RNA? How is it, then, that your genome is not full of cow and fish and pea and mushroom (etc.) DNA?
Pfizer did not hide anything from regulators. The SV40 promoter element is, in fact, a common feature of plasmids. If you are a researcher, you can buy plasmids containing the SV40 promoter and insert whatever gene you want into the plasmid. How is it that regulators would be unaware of a common plasmid element? Oh, they wouldn't be unaware of it. They also wouldn't be concerned since they understand the difference between a promoter and an oncogene.
Oh, here is a link to a list of some plasmids in current use: TA and GC Cloning Vectors. Many of those plasmids contain SV40 promoters. There are many other plasmids in use, as well, many of which contain SV40 promoters.